7-25-2009

Beach Clean-up & Tunnel Session
Here\'s your chance to make a difference! After th...

8-22-2009

Beach Clean-up & Tunnel Session
Enjoy some after-work beach time with Surfrider!...

9-12-2009

Paddle Out for Clean Water
We\'ll meet at Gilgo Beach in front of the main li...

full calendar...

     

 


WINDFARM


SHORTCUT TO PETITION/LETTERS: (explore)

 

Very Important! concerning the wind farm...
Although the Official Public Comment duration is over - you can still voice your concerns to MMS (Mineral Management Services) regarding the Offshore wind farm!

Send your comments electronically: (link)
or send written comments to:


Comments on EIS Scoping for the LIOWP Project
Minerals Management Service, MS 5412
1201 Elmwood Park Blvd.
New Orleans, LA 70123

PRINT  SIGN SEND
our prewritten letters - SEE THE LETTER WRITING LINK ABOVE

 
     
 
     
 


Illustration by Jack Sherman, Newsday ©2007.


LIPA chief kills wind farm project
BY MARK HARRINGTON
6:00 PM EDT, August 22, 2007

Long Island Power Authority Chairman Kevin Law Wednesday said he will "terminate" a controversial project to install 40 wind turbines off the coast of Jones Beach, dealing a fatal blow to a plan alternately portrayed as an environmental necessity and an economic boondoggle.

The decision follows Law's review of a recently completed independent report on the economics of the $700 million project that he said showed its costs to be "significantly" higher than traditional forms of energy generation or even a new energy-efficient plant. Legislators and citizens groups have criticized the plan since it was proposed in 2003, but a small cadre of environmental groups, some with financial ties to LIPA, had been among its most ardent supporters. Recently, even some of those proponents have expressed surprise at the soaring cost of the project.

Law emphasized that the decision, which he will discuss with trustees at a Sept. 22 LIPA board meeting, doesn't mean an end to wind power proposals for Long Island. He will continue to pursue that source of alternative energy, he said, including possibly land-based windmills, at other locations. The Jones Beach location, he said, is off the table.

"While I'm a supporter of renewable energy, I've decided this project doesn't make any economic sense, and I will recommend to LIPA trustees that we terminate it," Law said in an interview with Newsday.

He said he'll work with local wind-energy advocates, including Gordian Raacke of Renewable Energy Long Island and Neal Lewis of the Neighborhood Network, to research possible wind proposals that "make economic sense." Law said he has already met with the groups to inform them of his plan.

Lewis Wednesday said he looks forward to going back to the drawing board on a wind-energy plan, agreeing the economics should have been discussed long ago.

"I think a number of things went wrong with the whole process," he said. "We indicated years ago that cost issues should have been brought out in a more forthright way."

Environmental activist Richard Schary, who has long criticized the deal's unknown finances, said his concern had always been that the project "was not about the environment."

Rather, he said, "it was about the money."

Other long-time critics hailed Law's decision.

"This is a victory for common sense," said Babylon Supervisor Steve Bellone, who Wednesday announced an effort to block placement of a planned transmission cable from the farm through beaches in his district. "It's a victory for the ratepayers of Long Island who ultimately would have borne the overwhelming burden of this costly, symbol project that ultimately would have delivered very little energy," Bellone said.

When LIPA first announced the plan, it estimated the cost to be between $150 million and $200 million. But LIPA did not disclose actual costs until Newsday filed a Freedom of Information Law request last year. Initially, LIPA denied the request, but on appeal it provided limited and outdated information disclosing that from FPL Energy's winning bid for the project in 2003 was $356 million. Newsday later reported that the cost had ballooned to $650 million by last October. LIPA, at Law's request this summer, disclosed the December 2006 cost to be just shy of $700 million.

In an April 2002 assessment, LIPA consultant AWS Scientific estimated energy from the wind farm would cost between 6 and 9 cents per kilowatt hour, then well above the 4.5-cent average LIPA paid. At the time, LIPA said advances in wind-power technology were continuously lowering the cost, so that electricity from the wind farm would be competitive with electricity from traditional sources.

But analysis since then by Dowling College's Long Island Economic and Social Policy Institute showed the cost would be more than six times that of standard power in the latter years of the contract.

Babylon supervisor Bellone by then had been banging the cost drum for more than a year, in August of 2006 calling the developer "the Halliburton of Wind Power."

A spokesman for FPL Energy declined to comment, noting, "We have not heard from LIPA relative to their intentions on the offshore project."
Copyright © 2007

 

 

QUICK FACT: The "Pencil" at Robert Moses State Park stands 200 feet tall.
MMS proposals dictate wind turbines to measure 440 feet tall when measured from the tip of the blade at its most upright position.

(Wind turbines will be more than DOUBLE the height of the Robert Moses water tower!

 

Central Long Island Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation (SurfriderCLI): Resolution to Protect and Preserve our oceanfront state and national parks from LIP A and FPL ENERGY's Proposed Offshore Wind Turbine Facility


Whereas parks, whether under the auspices of local, state, or national governments, are established as inviolable public places for the purposes of recreation, renewal, rejuvenation, reflection, and communion with unspoiled nature;


whereas the most essential aesthetic feature of the oceanfront state and national parks directly affected by LlPA and FPL's proposed offshore wind turbine facility is an unobstructed view of the seascape;


whereas LlPA and FPL's wind turbines will reach nearly 450' feet above the horizon, will cover eight square miles of seascape only 3.6 miles offshore, and will be easily visible from Jones Beach State Park, Robert Moses State Park, Gilgo State Park, Captree State Park, and the western half of the Fire Island National Seashore;
whereas this offshore turbine facility would obliterate the present view of an unspoiled ocean from these parks and destroy for current and future generations the central aesthetic experience these parks were meant to celebrate and preserve;


whereas Jones Beach State Park has been designated a place of national historical importance;
whereas parks are lands set aside in the public trust and this bestows upon us a duty to preserve and pass these parks on to future generations in the same state that they were entrusted to us;


whereas allowing construction of a commercial facility of this magnitude on the doorsteps of our most beloved oceanfront parks would set a dangerous precedent whereby other New York State parks and national parks may be sacrificed for commercial profit;


therefore, we, the concerned citizens of Long Island and New York State, in order to uphold our sacred trust to protect and preserve our public parks for future generations, demand that any and all plans for LlPA and FPL's wind turbine facility in the ocean waters just off of Jones Beach State Park be permanently and immediately abandoned.


Alliance to Protect State Parks

DOWNLOAD ABOVE RESOLUTION: (doc)

 

QUICK FACT: Storms do not mean "more power."
The MMS proposal offers information that wind power is successful only during "optimum wind circumstances" - and go on to explain this margin for "optimum" is extremely limited. Did you know the turbines operate only in moderate wind speeds, and are shut down in strong or especially light winds? So on those 95 degrees in July when there is hardly any breeze and the air-conditioners and ice-makers are doing double-duty, the turbines will be still, and conventional power plants will be burning more oil and gas.
(The same will be true on brutally cold winter days, when the north wind is blowing a gale and people are cranking up their electric heaters).

 

Central Long Island Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation (SurfriderCLI): Resolution to Protect and Preserve our oceanfront state and national parks from LIP A and FPL ENERGY's Proposed Offshore Wind Turbine Facility


Whereas parks, whether under the auspices of local, state, or national governments, are established as inviolable public places for the purposes of recreation, renewal, rejuvenation, reflection, and communion with unspoiled nature;


whereas the most essential aesthetic feature of the oceanfront state and national parks directly affected by LlPA and FPL's proposed offshore wind turbine facility is an unobstructed view of the seascape;


whereas LlPA and FPL's wind turbines will reach nearly 450' feet above the horizon, will cover eight square miles of seascape only 3.6 miles offshore, and will be easily visible from Jones Beach State Park, Robert Moses State Park, Gilgo State Park, Captree State Park, and the western half of the Fire Island National Seashore;
whereas this offshore turbine facility would obliterate the present view of an unspoiled ocean from these parks and destroy for current and future generations the central aesthetic experience these parks were meant to celebrate and preserve;


whereas Jones Beach State Park has been designated a place of national historical importance;
whereas parks are lands set aside in the public trust and this bestows upon us a duty to preserve and pass these parks on to future generations in the same state that they were entrusted to us;


whereas allowing construction of a commercial facility of this magnitude on the doorsteps of our most beloved oceanfront parks would set a dangerous precedent whereby other New York State parks and national parks may be sacrificed for commercial profit;


therefore, we, the concerned citizens of Long Island and New York State, in order to uphold our sacred trust to protect and preserve our public parks for future generations, demand that any and all plans for LlPA and FPL's wind turbine facility in the ocean waters just off of Jones Beach State Park be permanently and immediately abandoned.


Alliance to Protect State Parks

DOWNLOAD ABOVE RESOLUTION: (doc)

 

 

ARTICLES (MOST RECENT NEAR BOTTOM):

11.02.06 NEWSDAY: High-profile campaign for planting turbines off Jones Beach wasn’t just ... Blowing in the wind

The high-profile campaign for a 40-turbine wind farm off Jones Beach may appear at times to be a spontaneous groundswell, but documents released to Newsday show a well-organized playbook behind the scenes...

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 11.02.06A ARTICLE: (pdf)

11.02.06 NEWSDAY: A powerful price Records show LIPA customers would be hard hit by higher energy costs if plans to build a wind farm off the South Shore get the go-ahead

Energy from the proposed South Shore wind farm will cost Long Island ratepayers as much as double the wholesale cost of energy from other sources, according to previously confidential bidding documents obtained by Newsday...

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 11.02.06B ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

11.01.06 newsday: LIPA records reveal some wind-farm costs

Energy from the proposed South Shore wind farm will cost Long Island ratepayers as much as double the wholesale cost of energy from other sources, according to previously confidential bidding documents obtained by Newsday...

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 11.01.06 ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

10.30.06 Newsday: Wind power’s payoff in Denmark It’s a global leader in the technology, and turbines are a common sight, but criticism and challenges persist

NYSTED, Denmark - Well beyond the entrance to the harbor in this remote village on the southeastern shores of Denmark, the array of wind turbines looms like a band of synchronized swimmers, giant arms spinning soundlessly as a gentle wind rakes the coast.

At the Rogeriet Restaurant on a recent September afternoon, Lars-Bo Hilker sits at an outdoor table sipping a beer and gazing off into the distance. He comes here once a week, he says, and the turbines have become a welcome fixture in the view, particularly considering the alternative. “It’s better than nuclear,” he says.

A block away, at the Nysted Sail Club, Jorgen Elgaard uses a four-letter word to express his opinion of the 72 turbines erected four years ago. At night, the red blinking lights atop the windmills turn the waterscape beyond the harbor into a disco, he says - and the power comes at a premium he thinks is too steep - in Europe a few cents more a kilowatt-hour. “You’ll get mad looking at all those red flashing lights,” Elgaard says... (Long Article Explaining How in Denmark Turbines not what originally promised)

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 10.30.06A ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

10.30.06 Newsday: LI, Mass. projects would be 1st in U.S

While large offshore wind farms have been spinning in Denmark for a half-dozen years, they have no U.S. counterparts - though that could change if proponents of two first-time projects off the coasts of Long Island and Massachusetts have their way...

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 10.30.06B ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

10.30.06 Newsday: LI, Mass. projects would be 1st in U.S

While large offshore wind farms have been spinning in Denmark for a half-dozen years, they have no U.S. counterparts - though that could change if proponents of two first-time projects off the coasts of Long Island and Massachusetts have their way...

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 10.30.06C ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

10.25.06newsday: LIPA records reveal some wind-farm costs

Energy from the proposed South Shore wind farm will cost Long Island ratepayers as much as double the wholesale cost of energy from other sources, according to previously confidential bidding documents obtained by Newsday...

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 10.25.06 ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

09.14.06 NEWSDAY: LIPA goes slow on turbine plan

With companies lining up proposals to submerge tidal-power turbines in more than a hundred square miles of water off Long Island, the Long Island Power Authority is using its position as gatekeeper to the local electric grid to call for a measured approach to the largely untested technology...

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 09.14.06 ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

09.13.06 MASSAPEQUA POST: WINDFARM SCOPING PROPOSAL URGED

Town of Babylon Supervisor Steven Bellone is calling on the Attorney General's Office and federal officials to investigate possible violations of federal environmental regulations concerning the public comment process overseen by the US Department of Interior's Minerals Management Service (MMS)

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 09.14.06 ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

08.31.06 NEWSDAY: BELLONE AIRS CONCERN OVER WINDMILL PROJECT

The public comment period for the controversial plan to put a wind farm in waters between Jones Beach and Robert Moses State Park may have ended. But that hasn’t stopped Babylon Supervisor Steve Bellone from publicly criticizing the company that wants to place 40 windmills off the shore of his town.

Yesterday Bellone accused FPL Energy - the Florida-based firm partnering with the Long Island Power Authority on the project - of trying to squeak it through with minimum environmental review.

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 08.31.06 ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

03.09.07 NEWSDAY: DATA PROBLEMS DELAY WIND FARM REVIEW

The federal agency reviewing plans for a 40-turbine wind farm off the coast of Jones Beach Thursday said it would delay release of a much-anticipated report on environmental impacts of the controversial project.

The first draft of the environmental impact statement for the proposal, which was scheduled to be released this month or next, has been postponed for months because of data collection delays, regulators said.

"It is taking longer than anticipated to gather the raw data needed to conduct the [National Environmental Protection Act] analysis," for the draft environmental impact statement, said Nicolette Nye, a spokeswoman for the Minerals Management Service, in an e-mail.

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 03.09.07 ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

WINDFARM COSTS TOO HIGH

04.02.07 NEWSDAY: REPORT: LIPA WIND FARM COST TOO STEEP

The proposal to build a 40-turbine wind farm off the South Shore would enrich its contractor with "extraordinary" returns while "saddling" Long Island ratepayers with a 20-year-plus contract for energy at "excessive" prices, a new study of the project's economics has found.

Scheduled to be released this week, the study, by the Long Island Economic & Social Policy Institute at Dowling College, questions the initial $356-million construction cost of the project and suggests LIPA explore the alternative of funding and building the wind farm itself, which it says would be cheaper.

"Wind energy makes sense for Long Island, but this contract does not," said the study's author, Mark Greer, a professor of economics at Dowling.

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 04.02.07 ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

04.18.07 NEWSDAY: WIND-FARM PROJECT COSTING OVER $600M

The target cost to build a wind farm in the waters off Jones Beach ballooned well past $600 million as of last fall, according to a source briefed on the LIPA-backed project, who said the escalations have put the proposal "on life support."

In addition, the updated fall proposal by contractor FPL Energy requested new contingencies that would require the Long Island Power Authority to bear some of the risk of the project beyond FPL's set costs. LIPA could benefit, however, if the project - FPL's first off-shore wind-farm - came in under budget, according to sources familiar with it.

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 04.18.07 ARTICLE: (pdf)

NEWSDAY IMG 2007.04.24

04.24.07 NEWSDAY: TOWN: GIVE US THE FULL PICTURE

Study in Babylon shows LIPA wind farm project view is limited

Photo simulations submitted for LIPA’s proposed offshore wind farm offer a limited, possibly undersized view of the 40-turbine array as it will appear in South Shore waters, a town supervisor charged yesterday.

After a study it commissioned last fall by a third-party imaging firm, the Town of Babylon produced its own photo simulations of the wind farm and found that, by comparison, the turbines portrayed in the Long Island Power Authority’s submissions “look smaller,” according to a report expected to be released today.

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 04.24.07 ARTICLE: (pdf)



08.10.07 NEWSDAY: COST BLOW AWAY WIND PLAN, SENATORS SAY

With a report from LIPA about the financial feasibility of its offshore wind-energy project due out in weeks, two state senators are calling on the authority to immediately scuttle the costly plans.

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 08.10.07 ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

08.09.07 NEWSDAY: Pols Call on LIPA to Dump Wind Farm

At a news conference, experts / pols called on LIPA to instead spend the $700 million in projected construction costs for the 40-turbine [wind]farm on projects such as commercial sola installations, solar panels for ratepayers' homes or overhauling the regions antiqued fossil-fuel power plants.

DOWNLOAD ENTIRE 08.09.07 ARTICLE: (pdf)

 

 

 

 

QUICK FACT: Count how many turbines you see above? (Answer: 20)
The first MMS proposal, slated for 40 wind turbines, is double the amount you se above. MMS has filed paperwork seeking permits for 8! More! propositions.
(Can you multiply?)

 

Action Alert

Dear Supporters,

Last year many of you, your family, and friends submitted your questions, comments, and concerns CQCC) to the Army Corps of Engineers. It is imperative that any new QCC be submitted and all of your original QCC be re-submitted to the Mineral Management Services before 08.21.06.

We regret that most of the ACOE questions, comments and concerns CQCC) remain unanswered. MMS is seeking input/QCC regarding the proposed Long Island Offshore Wind Park. (LIOWP)OCC can be sent to the MMS via their website (explore)

Please see the following list of issues that you can insert into your responses. Please use any or all of these important issues to help us preserve the Long Island we know and love.

Thank you

Surfrider Central Long Island

- - - -
The Central Long Island Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation requests that the following considerations be made an immediate part of the Draft Environmental Impact Study for LIP A and FPL 's proposed offshore wind turbine facility:

1. Stop the fast tracking of this process until all rules, regulations and guidelines for all offshore renewable energy projects have been promulgated by Mineral Management Services.

2. Full NEPA compliance including a full range of alternatives and a cost benefit analysis that incorporates all economic aspects of this proposal (i.e. commercial and recreational fisheries, maritime trade, tourism, property values, etc.) and not just the benefits or citing of the entire wind plant proposal.

3. Require applicants to explain in full and clear detail how and why the turbine locations were selected and what avoidance and minimization measures are incorporated into the project design to avoid or reduce fish and wildlife impacts.

4. Require site specific studies be undertaken to document resources that may be affected by the transmission cable from its oceanic connection terminal to its final destination on land.

5. Require applicants to provide clear justification, through environmental analysis, for their choice of the cable route and to explain why they have not explored other feasible routes such as usage of the Wantagh Causeway.

6. Require that MMS hold the permit application in abeyance until the applicants erect a jack up barge platform in the proposed area and conduct radar surveys for winged species passing through this region for three years prior to any start up. Require specifically that three years of pre-construction studies be completed using a combination of radar (horizontal and vertical), acoustic, direct field sampling, and visual observation be employed. Require that the remote sensing (radar & acoustic) should be operated continually 365 days of the year.

7. Require that applicants provide full descriptions of how the applicants intend to avoid avian electrocutions, serving as perching areas, and lighting schemes for all structures.

8. Require that formal consultations under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for all federally listed threatened and endangered species occurring in this region be undertaken and incorporated into the OEIS.

9. Require that applicants evaluate the potential effects of the proposed project on all significant habitats in the area and that applicants provide the results in the OEIS.

10. Require applicants to complete a navigation risk assessment of the proposals potential impact on navigational and aviation safety, search and rescue operations, communications, radar, and positioning systems.

11. NEP A requires that all direct, secondary and cumulative impacts of all recent past, present, and future foreseeable actions be included in the assessment. To accomplish, require applicants to use a full ecosystem and multi-ecosystem approach to the task at hand.

12. Require that accurate assessments of ensuing essential fish habitat (EFH) damage, pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation Management Act, be incorporated into the OEIS. This will not only include the direct impacts but indirect and cumulative as well.

13. Important coastal zone implications, such as conflicts with traditional use and economic dependency with respect to the siting of this proposal, must be addressed in the OEIS.

14. Only peered reviewed technical literature and ready for staff and public review should be included in the OEIS. Internal industry reports may be included but should not be the basis used in this decision making process. These internal documents should also clarify how the circumstances described in the citation compare with the proposed project.


15. Require the project proponent to address environmental impacts that would accrue in all construction and lay down areas to ensure that sediment contours are restored to their pre-construction elevations and stabilized so they can be expeditiously re-colonized.

16. Require a wetland and aquatic bed survey and developed strategy to ensure that existing values and functions of littoral habitats are maintained.

17. Require a detailed analysis of the potential for thermal loading and electromagnetic fields associated with this entire proposal of the adverse effects that would result and an explanation of how they will avoid these impacts.

18. Require a sediment transport model data that forecasts erosional patterns and processes under normal and significant storm events for all seasons.

19. Require a full cumulative impact analysis regarding cultural and natural resources that fully considers the impacts to the view shed.

20. Require the applicant to provide a full listing of all of the various permits (federal, state, county and local) that it will need in order to proceed. This list should include timeframes and current status of each individual permit action.

21. Require an analysis of credible storm strikes on the integrity of the proposed projects structures.

22. Require that LIPA's Master Energy Plan appear in the DEIS.

23. Require the applicants to provide their plans for offshore oil and fuel spill discharges and publish results in DEIS.

24. The State of New Jersey's Coastal Zone Management Office must be consulted and kept apprised of all developments. This project will impact New Jersey's ports, shipping traffic, fisheries, tourism, land traffic, and numerous other adjacent issues including the City of Bayonne being used as the staging and lay down area for this proposal.

25. DEIS should include a full discussion of how this means of creating electricity will lead to the diminished use of fossil fuels.

26. Require applicants to assess the likely cost, in terms of psychological stress and potential associated health care costs, on all residents living within one hour from all impacted beaches, that may result from the project's destruction of the view shed of an internationally known oceanfront state park that people have enjoyed for 60 years.

27. Require that applicants determine the economic costs of potential lost revenues to affected municipal, state, and national parks and adjacent communities over the next thirty years should people reduce the number of visits made to affected parks and their adjacent communities due to potential visual and auditory pollution in the parks from this facility.

28. Require that applicants assess fully all possible cultural and economic costs regionally and nation-wide that might result over 30 years from similar projects being located adjacent to both coastal and interior state and national parks, should construction of this facility establish a cultural or legal precedent whereby parklands will no longer be protected from adjacent industrial site.

29. Require applicants to assess any possible effects on beach morphology that might occur along all shorelines within 25 miles of the project due to changes in wave patterns resulting from wave refraction around the facility's structures.

DOWNLOAD ACTION ALERT: (doc)

 

QUICK FACT: The "Pencil" you see at Robert Moses State Park is just over 9 miles away when looking diagonally from Gilgo Beach, Babylon.
MMS proposals dictate wind turbines to be staggered between 3.6 and 5 miles away from the shoreline.

(Imagine wind turbines HALF as far away as this tower and TWICE as high!)

 

ARCHIVE NEWS:

07.11.06 MINERALS MANAGEMENTSERVICE PUBLIC HEARING MEETINGS

A great presence was made at at Minerals Management Service (MMS) scoping meetings held on July 10 in West Babylon and July 11 in Massapequa. Almost 1000 people showed up on Monday and nearly 500 on Tuesday to urge their concerns within 3 minute allotments to the a panel of MMS representatives and their fellow community members. Despite radical views both pro and con the project; the underlying notion was to urge the committee to require a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to ensure environmental, migratory, aquatic, and electromagnetic effects are taken as serious concerns.

Special thanks to all Surfrider members who attended. We are confident that our collective presence and voice will have an impact on the Federal regulatory review process of the proposed windfarm project.

We urge you to contact your governing officials (see our local campaign> letter section for a script you can simply download, print, sign, and send) to share YOUR VIEWS on this proposed Windfarm project.

Surfrider also needs ANYONE interested in protecting the parks to help out an hour or so every weekend down at the beaches educating the public about the project and gain support for keeping industrialization out of our state beaches.